EVIDENCE COMPARISON

Directional

Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF)
vs Cysteamine
for Pigmentation Reduction

Early or indirect evidence suggests cysteamine may reduce pigmentation nearly 4 times more effectively than EGF for improving skin tone, based on indirect comparison.

3.77x

Effect ratio

Cysteamine

Favored

2

Studies

Indirect

Comparison

This is an indirect comparison — the two ingredients were not tested head-to-head in the same trial. The ratio is derived from separate studies against a common comparator.

Tone

How to read this claim

Kept public as exploratory because it indirect comparison; includes subjective endpoint; early-stage evidence tier.

Some study-specific context may affect how broadly this comparison generalizes.

Source Studies (2)

Self‐applied topical interventions for melasma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of data from randomized, investigator‐blinded clinical trials

randomized, split-face

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Split-Face Study of the Efficacy of Topical Epidermal Growth Factor for the Treatment of Melasma.

randomized, double-blind, split-face
Explore all comparisons →